Tag Archives: MIS40910

Which contextual, behavioural & social factors are responsible for producing technically efficient innovations? Project Paper

MSc. iBusiness – Smurfit UCD – Tarun Rattan First I would like to thank our course co-coordinator Prof. Donncha Kavanagh who introduced the class to so many of these new concepts around business & research enquiry. I found all the … Continue reading →

1.   Gordon, R. (2012) Is U.S. Economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. Cambridge MA. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1.Gordon2012 – Is US growth over? 2.   Parker, M. (2013) Becoming Editor: Or, Pinocchio finally notices the Strings.  … Continue reading →

1.  Ghoshal, S. (2005) ‘Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices’, Academy Of Management Learning & Education, 4(1): 75-91. 1.Ghoshal2005-Bad Management Theories 2.  Stein, M. & Pinto, J. (2011) The Dark Side of Groups: A “Gang at Work” in … Continue reading →

1.Scherer, F.M. (2001) ‘The Innovation Lottery’, in R. C. Dreyfuss, D. L. Zimmerman and H. First (eds.) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [13MB!] 1.Scherer2001-The Innovaton Lottery 2.Orlikowski, Wanda J, … Continue reading →

1.  Flyvbjerg, B. (2011) Case Study. IN DENZIN, N. K. & LINCOLN, Y. S. (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1.Flyvbjerg2011-Sage Handbook Of Qualitative Research 2.  Fitzgerald, B. & Howcroft, D. (1998) Towards … Continue reading →

1.  March, James G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. 1.March1991-Exploration & Exploitation 2.  Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1935). The Art of Asking WHY in Marketing Research: Three Principles Underlying the Formulation of Questionnaires. National Marketing … Continue reading →

The main motivation of the paper as remarked at its outset is to clarify the definitive of “openness” as currently used in the literature on open innovation and to re-conceptualize the idea for future research on the topic. To examine … Continue reading →

1. Dahlander, L. and Gann, D. M. (2010) ‘How open is innovation?’, Research Policy, 39(6): 699-709. 1.Dahlander2010 – How open is Innovation 2.  Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations … Continue reading →

1.Sutton, R. I. and Rafaeli, A. (1988) ‘Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores’, The Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 461-487. 1.Sutton1988-Untangling Emotions & Organisational Sales 2.Stearns, P. N. (2012) ‘The history of … Continue reading →